Cases 51 - 60 of 273
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Stewart v. Iowa, State of et al
as 5:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Mercedes T Stewart
Defendant:
Iowa, State of, Plymouth County Jail and Briann Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cousik et al v. Phelan et al
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Tejas Cousik, Tarin Allen, Jake Douglas and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Patrick Phelan, City of Aurora, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00817
Plaintiff:
Daffern, Brycen Daffern, David Dahl and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Domoracki v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Brianne M Domoracki
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Brooks et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
TRACY BROOKS, DAMON BROOKS, PAUL CARTER and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
JPMU, LLC v. BW Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
JPMU, LLC
Defendant:
BW Brands, LLC., Briann K. Welborn and BW Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Redmond v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01105
Petitioner:
Dara Briann Redmond
Respondent:
Warden Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simpson v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Preston Wade Simpson
Defendant:
Joel J. Schwartz and Brianne Rose Besheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Six v. American Fidelity Corporation
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brianne Six
Defendant:
American Fidelity Corporation and American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
