Cases 51 - 60 of 114
Linda May, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90035
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LINDA C. MAY, HAZEL MAYE, KAWAMBE K. MAY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Williams v. Shambley et al
as 1:2015cv04400
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Ashley Nicole Shambley, Keith Najib Ahmad and Dolorita C. May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00718
Plaintiff:
Linda C May , Hazel Maye , Kawambe K May and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James May v. Richard, et al
as 14-2570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James C. May
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard, Dr., Arkansas Department of Correction, Dr. Robert Forrest, Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Wendy Kelley and others
Orshowitz v. Dappen et al
as 2:2014cv14197
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Orshowitz
Defendant:
Donald Dappen, TROY W MORRIS, chadwick e wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Polk v. Merchant et al
as 5:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Chezera R Polk
Defendant:
Dawn Merchant, J Powers, T Rust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Matsen et al
as 3:2014cv05075
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Terrie Matsen , Cheryl Sullivan , Kerri S McTarsney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durgin et al v. Teton, Ltd
as 1:2013cv00638
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Durgin, Jr , Harrison Kreifels , Linda C May and others
Defendant:
Teton, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Matthew Morris v. Paul May, et al
as 13-13996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW PAUL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL C. MAY, Sheriff, RONALD WHITE, Jail Admin. and SONYA OLDHAM, Head Nurse, sued in their individual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
