Cases 51 - 60 of 375
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta
as 5:2022cv08861
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC doing business as NetChoice
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Eric Goldman, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NA of Mftr v. SEC
as 22-51069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
National Association of Manufacturers and Natural Gas Services Group, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Gary Gensler, in his official capacity as Chair of the SEC
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Joseph A. Grundfest and others
Not Classified By Court:
Society for Corporate Governance
In re: Waverly Licensing LLC
as 23-109
Petitioner:
In re: WAVERLY LICENSING LLC, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE and others
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC and GRANITE RIVER LABS INC.
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Bartolomeo et al
as 3:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Associated Builders and Contractors, Associated Builders and Contractors of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Dante Bartolomeo, William Tong and Connecticut Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 6:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Longview Chamber of Commerce, American Bankers Association and others
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Rohit Chopra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Laliberte et al v. Quanta Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv03290
Plaintiff:
Mary Laliberte and Marie McKnight
Defendant:
Quanta Services, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Quanta Services, Inc. and The Quanta Services, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. SPELLMON et al
as 1:2022cv02586
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
LT. SCOTT A. SPELLMON and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Anderson v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06826
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Anderson
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Advance Publications, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Advance 401(k) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Beldock et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Justin Beldock, Gordon Broward and Shaadi Nezami
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, 401(K) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(K) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Kistler et al v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lang and James Kistler
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc, The Board of Trustees of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Stanley Black & Decker Retirement Account Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
