Cases 51 - 60 of 447
Marcus Thorpe v. Derrick Copeland
as 23-6333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS A. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
DERRICK COPELAND, f/k/a John Does 1-5, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, f/k/a John Does 1-5 and others
Defendant:
ANITA GOWANS, f/k/a A. Gowans, Nurse, Alexander CI, JOHN DOES, Correctional Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE, Medical Doctor and others
Johnson v. McMorrow
as 23-490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Trooper Andrew McMorrow, Trooper Marisa Rodriguez and John Doe #1-10
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lion/Jones v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Christopher Johnson and Tyrone Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03721
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Etherly et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Etherly, Kelley, Grahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. DANTICO et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL DANTICO and FATIMA S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Johnson
as 22-3221
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
