Cases 51 - 60 of 34,586
Sanford v. The 3M Company et al
as 4:2024cv00741
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cook v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Melissa Cook
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Neese
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
David cook
Defendant:
thomas neese, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Anderson v. DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Anderson
Defendant:
DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., Stanley Jaworski, Richard Bravman and others
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Ashley Reshe Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Chet Rigney, Tasheena Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palato v Cook et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Fred Palato
Defendant:
Michelle Cook, Deputy Nathan K Jones, Deputy Tyler R Giebeig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNGDALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
KIRK YOUNGDALE
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, INC. IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
David Martin v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-1915
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, GREGORY EMMETT AHERN, JR., COUNTY OF COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
