Cases 51 - 60 of 924
Arabie v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Dea-Adel Arabie
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Goings v. DEA et al
as 3:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Corey Goings
Defendant:
DEA and Tennessee State Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. Holmes v. Anne Milgram
as 23-1749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. HOLMES, a/k/a C. Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator of DEA
James v. Gautreaux
as 23-30463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Sid J. Gautreaux, III and United States DEA
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Gonzalez (PS) v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kalma Harris, A Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jasmol Singh et al v. Heja Rosebiani et al
as 2:2023cv05115
Plaintiff:
Jasmol Singh and Umit Bagga
Defendant:
DEA Special Agent Heja Rosebiani, DEA Special Agent Mark Carroll, CHP Officer Jay Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deas v. Georgetown Detention Center
as 1:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
Lamont Deas
Defendant:
Georgetown Detention Center, Georgetown Police Department, Sheriff Adam C Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
