Cases 51 - 60 of 470
Crawford v. Radtke
as 2:2021cv00723
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Petitioner:
David Earl Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Carpenter
as 21-6070
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID EARL CARPENTER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wattleton v. Klein, Ph.D. et al
as 1:2021cv01304
Defendant:
John P. Daniels, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons Risk Assessment Panel, Emily Wakeman, Ph. D. and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutherland v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., et al
as 6:2021cv00671
Defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Farnsworth v. Andrew Saul
as 21-35088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL FARNSWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Kronk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
David E. Kronk and David Earl Kronk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Britt v. Mangum et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Unknown Other Officials, Janis G. Mangum, Jackson County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Andrews
as 1:2021cv00013
Respondent:
J Andrews
Petitioner:
David Earl Watson
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EARL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05535
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
