Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Mayes v. Stephenson
as 1:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
David Todd Mayes
Defendant:
Zena Stepheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Stepheson et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Todd Mayes
Defendant:
Zena Stepheson, FNU Turner, FNU Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01255
Plaintiff:
David Todd
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
VINCENT et al v. VICK et al
as 1:2017cv00762
Plaintiff:
DAVID TODD VINCENT and SUSAN T. VINCENT
Defendant:
WENDY SMITH VICK, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Counter_claimant:
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
DAVID TODD VINCENT and SUSAN T. VINCENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hollander v. Garrett
as 17-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Den Hollander
Defendant - Appellee:
Major Elliott Garrett, CBS News reporter, Katharine Bear Tur, NBC News reporter, Charles David Todd, NBC moderator of Meet the Press and others
Cotten v. Cimline, Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Todd Cotten
Defendant:
Cimline, Inc and Plymouth Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kingsbury et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2017cv02272
Plaintiff:
Beth Kingsbury , Jill Koenig and Savannah Williams
Defendant:
Allison Clark , Keegan Kok , Mattia Nanfria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott Todd v. Ian Wallace
as 16-4439
Petitioner - Appellant:
Scott David Todd
Respondent - Appellee:
Ian Wallace, Warden
Bennett #630082 v. Burt et al
as 1:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
David Todd Bennett #630082, Sr.
Defendant:
S. L. Burt, Roger Eckert, Roger Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollander v. Garrett et al
as 1:2016cv06624
Defendant:
Major Elliott Garrett, Katharine Bear Tur, Charles David Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Den Hollander
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
