Cases 51 - 60 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hegeman v. Ferland et al
as 3:2018cv00349
Petitioner:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
E. James Ferland, Thomas A. Christopher, Jenny L. Apker and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Hegeman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 3:2018cv00347
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, E. James Ferland, Thomas A. Christopher and others
Plaintiff:
Bud and Sue Frashier Family Trust, Mike Deangelis and Dan Hegeman
Petitioner:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bud and Sue Frashier Family Trust v. Apker et al
as 3:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Bud and Sue Frashier Family Trust
Defendant:
E. James Ferland, Jenny L. Apker, Thomas A. Christopher and others
Petitioner:
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Rose et al
as 1:2018cv03505
Plaintiff:
Glenn Brown
Defendant:
Robin Rose, Dr. Marshall E. James, Dr. He Yuan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2018cv02826
Defendant:
Suffolk County and S.C. Homicide section
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2018cv00548
Petitioner:
VAUGHN E. JAMES
Respondent:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
