Cases 51 - 60 of 67,870
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Damien Bey
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Benton Institute for Broadband & Society v. FCC, et al
as 24-1162
Petitioner:
Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Independent Market Monitor for PJM v. FERC
as 24-1164
Petitioner:
Independent Market Monitor for PJM
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-3450
Petitioner:
OHIO CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCTA v. FCC, et al
as 24-2092
Petitioner:
Missouri Internet & Television Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Margaret Smith v. Stephanie McComas
as 24-1479
Plaintiff:
MARGARET JEAN SMITH
Defendant:
STEPHANIE R. MCCOMAS, STATE HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Ohio Telecom Association, et al v. FCC, et al
as 24-3449
Petitioner:
OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION and USTELECOM, The Broadband Association
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boswell v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
James Boswell
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, City of Fort Worth Texas, United States Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hallmark v. First New York Federal Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Hallmark
Defendant:
First New York Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
