Cases 51 - 60 of 1,141
AKG v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
AKG, Austin Gunter, Aaron Vanbuskirk and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, John Canavan, Tracy McDaniel and others
GRUBBS v. USA
as 3:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
CLARENCE GRUBBS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GRUBBS v. NEXT PROCESSES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01429
Defendant:
NEXT PROCESSES, INC., THAR-PROCESS, INC. and ZAC SHEPARD
Plaintiff:
CAREY GRUBBS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ST CLAIR v. KEEN et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST CLAIR, JR
Defendant:
KEEN, CPT 1, CPT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUBBS v. COCHRAN et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
KEITH GRUBBS
Defendant:
WILLIAM COCHRAN, COCHRAN COACHWORKS, WILLIAM J COCHRAN and others
GRUBB v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10839
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH GRUBB
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRUBBS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
JIMMIE V. GRUBBS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Grubbs v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06247
Plaintiff:
Karen Grubbs
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grubbs v. Wormuth
as 6:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roosevelt Grubbs, Jr
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Whitten v. Mays et al
as 7:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Antwon Whitten
Defendant:
C. Mays, Gibson and Grubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
