Cases 51 - 60 of 250
Midyett v. Clarke
as 3:2019cv00262
Petitioner:
Howard Joseph Midyett
Respondent:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
L.L.D., LLC et al v. Enpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jennie M. Clement, Robert O. Walker, 2 Hill LLC and others
Defendant:
Enpro Industries, Inc., Samuel G. Williamson, Goodrich Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Santerlli et al
as 1:2018cv07249
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Warden Santerlli
Plaintiff:
William H. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Pitter et al
as 1:2018cv01333
Defendant:
C. Pitter, B. Cabell, G. Bowles and others
Plaintiff:
Jadon K. Artis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Santerelli et al
as 1:2018cv06927
Defendant:
Maxwell and Santerelli
Plaintiff:
William H. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumika Polymers North America, LLC v. Global Team USA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11988
Plaintiff:
Sumika Polymers North America, LLC
Defendant:
Global Team USA, LLC , Petra H. Clark , Steven L. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lollis v. Wells et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Petitioner:
Darryl Brandon Lollis
Defendant:
J.R. Wells, T. Ray and H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. DHC Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keller
Defendant:
DHC Enterprises, Inc. and Diana H Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Clark v. Marsden Bldg Maintenance, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2018cv00999
Plaintiff:
William H. Clark
Defendant:
Marsden Bldg Maintenance, L.L.C., Troy Marcotte and Debbie Huybers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
United States of America v. Douglas H. Clark et al
as 2:2018cv00525
Defendant:
Chip-N-Dale's Custom Landscaping, Inc., Douglas H Clark, Douglas H. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
