Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. MCCONNELL
as 3:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEONARD SWEENEY
Defendant:
MITCH MCCONNELL, HARRY REID, JOHN BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWEENEY v. MCCONNELL
as 3:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEONARD SWEENEY
Defendant:
MITCH MCCONNELL, HARRY REID, JOHN A BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
