Cases 51 - 60 of 5,007
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr. and Jarvis Jermaine Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wolf Guts v. County et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant:
Mr. M County, Dr. Haar, Dr Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAMPTON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAMPTON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Parker v. C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Claud v. Brown Harris Stevens Residential Sales, LLC
as 24-584
Plaintiff:
SHAUNCY CLAUD
Defendant:
BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALES, LLC and BROWN HARRIS STEVENS OF THE HAMPTONS, LLC
Essex Capital Group, INC v. Warnell, Jr. et al
as 8:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
ESSEX CAPITAL GROUP, INC and Essex Capital Group, INC.
Defendant:
Harold Brooks Warnell, Jr., Kenneth Hampton Warnell, AgSouth Farm Credit, ACA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
