Cases 51 - 60 of 450
Wilson et al v. Dell Inc.
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
James Wilson and Cenie Trammell
Defendant:
Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Boggess v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Wilson Boggess
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Charles Tingler v. Catherine Hastings, et al
as 23-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TINGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE HASTINGS, Parole Officer, JAMES WILSON, Senior Parole Officer, TED DAVIS, Unit Supervisor and others
Turner v. Trad et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Nicole Ann Turner
Defendant:
J M Trad, Buddy Arron Stuart, Thomas Fajks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wilson v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv14310
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
TERRY JAMES WILSON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinshaw v. Columbia County, AR
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hinshaw
Defendant:
Columbia County, Arkansas, Leroy Martin, Jerry Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Clarke
as 3:2022cv00803
Petitioner:
Delvin James Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
