Cases 51 - 60 of 526
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Entzel et al
as 3:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jamar Holt
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Fred Entzel, Eric Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers et al v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2019cv00757
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Myers, Vivian G. Myers and Walter R. Myers
Defendant:
Steve Cooper, Job Ouma, Erick Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nassif et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Lance Dore, Jane or John Does 2-10, Timothy Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Nassif, Kim Nassif and Matthew Nassif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuhbander v. John Doe #1 et al
as 3:2019cv00167
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Kuhbander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rural Health Access Corporation v. Sydian Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00675
Defendant:
Sydian Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1 Through 5
Plaintiff:
Rural Health Access Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe v. Ballard et al
as 2:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Ex-Warden David Ballard, Commissioner Betsy Jividen, Captain Brian Penick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith W.R. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gum v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gum
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc., Sam's East, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
