Cases 51 - 60 of 260
Francis v. Lumpkin
as 21-10667
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Francis
Portis v. McKinney
as 1:2021cv02842
Plaintiff:
Charles Portis
Defendant:
John Francis McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FRANCIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20246
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francis v. Lumpkin
as 21-10335
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Francis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HEFELE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05519
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCIS HEFELE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv03993
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Francis Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francis v. Unknown
as 3:2020cv03399
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Matthews v. John Healey, Jr., et al
as 20-20496
Defendant / Appellee:
Milton Wright, Former Fort Bend County Sheriff, Troy Nehls, Fort Bend County Sheriff and John Francis Healey, Jr., Fort Bend County District Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Earnest J. Matthews
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
