Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Bryant et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv16216
Plaintiff:
Wendy Bryant and James A. Bryant, III
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Byars et al
as 1:2013cv02665
Petitioner:
James N Bryant, III
Respondent:
William R Byars and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. MAT Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01834
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant
Defendant:
MAT Holdings, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc , Home Depot Store 3803 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hidalgo et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2013cv04941
Plaintiff:
Paul Don Hidalgo and Barbara Hidalgo
Defendant:
James E. Bryant and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRYANT et al v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINFORD BRYANT , HENRY JENKINS , STEVEN BURKE and others
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
James Bryant v. Warden Broad River
as 13-6558
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. BRYANT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
ABNEY et al v. PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC
as 3:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABNEY, MICHAEL S ADAMS, JOHN C ALDERMAN and others
Defendant:
PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC doing business as P2S, FLUOR ENTERPRISES INC, BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant v. Byars et al
as 1:2013mc00011
Petitioner:
James N Bryant, III
Respondent:
William R Byars and Alan Wilson
US v. James Bryant
as 12-8060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ALBERT BRYANT
Bryant v. USA
as 4:2012cv00242
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Albert Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
