Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Barnes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07682
Plaintiff:
Martha R. Barnes and James H. Barnes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Capps et al v. Cremation Options, Inc et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00545
Plaintiff:
Sherry J Capps , Charlotte P DelGaicco and Brian D Pierce
Defendant:
Cremation Options, Inc , Helen B Taylor, David Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnes et al v. San Miguel et al
as 3:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
James P. Barnes and Donna Barnes
Defendant:
Jose R. San Miguel and Gabriel Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Boyer, et al v. Reed Smith LLP
as 3:2012cv05815
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Boyer and Catherine Boyer
Defendant:
Reed Smith LLP , James J Barnes and LMJ Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00738
Plaintiff:
James W Barnes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARNES v. MACK
as 3:2011cv05803
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
LUIS MACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
as 3:2011cv05445
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Barnes et al
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wright , John C Kent , Northark Title Group Inc and others
Defendant:
James A Barnes , Nick Bray, Nick Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARNES v. MERCER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
as 3:2011cv04995
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
as 3:2011cv04812
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
