Cases 51 - 60 of 18,390
Soplopuco et al v. JLM Decorating, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04306
Plaintiff:
Jordan Soplopuco and Jose Rivera Vieda
Defendant:
JLM Decorating, Inc., JLM Decorating NYC Inc, Cosmopolitan Interior NY Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Reid
as 24-1521
Defendant:
DWIGHT REID, CASWELL SENIOR, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, William Tong, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRIPLIN v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, JILL BIDEN, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Jordan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Jerome Jordan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Mrs. FNU Johnson, Holliday Unit Intake Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gilliland v. Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jordan Gilliland
Defendant:
Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC and Melissa Key
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
