Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Dae Sung Hi Tech. Co., Ltd. et al v. GThunder et al
as 2:2018cv07884
Defendant:
Jomoshop, American Shopping, Lovely Home Essentials and others
Plaintiff:
First 2 Market Products, LLC and Dae Sung Hi Tech. Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Romero v. Castro Constructive Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01723
Defendant:
KD Construction of Florida, Inc. and Castro Constructive Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victor Romero
Undetermined:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KDS NAIL PRODUCTS et al v. ACS Natural, LLC
as 4:2018cv01681
Plaintiff:
KDS NAIL PRODUCTS and Ma Vinh Dat
Defendant:
ACS Natural, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bryant-EL v. Rose et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Cortney Bryant-EL
Defendant:
May Jane Rose, Donald Bennett and KD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Mason v. KDs Donuts LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02096
Defendant:
Does, EPL Center LLC, KDs Donuts, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Mason
Landry v. PosiGen, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08444
Defendant:
PosiGen Energy Efficiency of Louisiana, LLC, PosiGen, LLC, PosiGen GP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Landry and BLG Innovative Solutions, LLC
Petitioner:
KD Homes Builder, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KD, et al vs. Douglas County Public School District No. 001, et al
as 8:2017cv00285
Defendant:
Daniel Bartels, Jane Doe, Joe Doe and others
Plaintiff:
JD and KD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KD et al v. Douglas County Public School District No. 001 et al
as 8:2017cv00270
Defendant:
Daniel Bartels, Jane Doe, Joe Doe and others
Plaintiff:
JD and KD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SD et al v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
SD , YM , SR and others
Defendant:
PAUL R LEPAGE and RICKER HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
