Cases 51 - 60 of 385
Rukhsana Mir et al v. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Scott Mathews, Leo Oorts, Thomas M. Fallo and others
Plaintiff:
Jehan Zeb Mir, MD, Rukhsana Mir and Jehan Zeb Mir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jim Ball, Jr. v. Moten, et al
as 20-14261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIM HENRY BALL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MOTEN, Sgt, KATHY L. DAVIS and SINGLETON, CO
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Harrison v. Commissioner of the Social Security
as 3:2020cv02580
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 6:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Treazure S Lindsey, Daniel R. Jett, Kathy L Claiborne and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Waynne Miller, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Culberath v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2020cv00492
Plaintiff:
Kathy Culberath and Kathy L. Culberath
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LINDSEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv10424
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL ("PCPC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
KATHY LINDSEY and KATHY L. LINDSEY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gandy v. Estee Lauder, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05779
Defendant:
ESTEE LAUDER, INC., ESTEE LAUDER INC. FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, JOHN DOES 1-30 and others
Plaintiff:
KATHY L. GANDY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Davis et al v. S&B Engineers and Constructors, Ltd. et al
as 4:2020cv01959
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo F Portillo, Aubrey W Davis, Kathi L Goedrich and others
Defendant:
Vestek Industries, LLC, Jeffrey Gilgenbach, Alan Konieczka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
