Cases 51 - 60 of 96
White v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
White v. Mckinna, et al
as 12-1285
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK MCKINNA, Supt. F.C.F and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General State of Colorado
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv01637
Plaintiff:
Larry White, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01662
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Whiting et al v. Hogan et al
as 3:2012cv08039
Plaintiff:
Larry Whiting , Leroy Whiting and Lorenzo Garcia
Defendant:
Dana A Hogan , Mayflower Transit LLC and Clark Moving and Storage Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
White Eagle v. Paguin
as 2:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Larry White Eagle
Respondent:
John Paguin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv08558
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
John Jones, III, et al v. National Marine Fisheries Serv, et al
as 11-35954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. JONES, III, JULIE JONES, LARRY WHITE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, WILLIAM W. STELLE, Jr., in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON RESOURCES CORPORATION
Whited et al v. Oneonta, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2011cv03689
Plaintiff:
Larry Whited and Karissa Whited
Defendant:
Oneonta, Alabama, City of and James Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.