Cases 51 - 60 of 743
Charles Wirth v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 22-16908
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES M. WIRTH
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
LeGrand v. DeMert Brands, LLC
as 0:2022cv62306
Plaintiff:
Condalisa LeGrand
Defendant:
DeMert Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LeGrand v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2022cv04168
Plaintiff:
John L. LeGrand
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Carpenter and Dan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sens et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 0:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
Eleonore Sens, Chandan Khanna and Robin Legrand
Defendant:
David Hutchinson, Officers John Does 1-4 and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeGrand v. DeMert Brands, LLC
as 3:2022cv07374
Plaintiff:
Condalisa LeGrand
Defendant:
DeMert Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Creekview IP, LLC v. Legrand North America, LLC
as 2:2022cv07909
Plaintiff:
Creekview IP, LLC
Defendant:
Legrand North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Riggs v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, A.G. Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LeGrand et al v. Abbott Laboratories
as 3:2022cv05815
Plaintiff:
Condalisa LeGrand and Larissa Bates
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hintze v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Hintze
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
