Cases 51 - 60 of 334
JAMES v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv21672
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
DIANE M. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Commissioner of Social
as 5:2019cv01051
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social
Plaintiff:
Kristi M James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. N.C. DPS PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00997
Defendant:
ISAAC ROGERS, N.C. DPS PRISONS and AMANDA COBB
Plaintiff:
TERMAINE M. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Electronic Sentencing Alternatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02579
Defendant:
Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. and Electronic Sentencing Alternatives, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry M. James and Larry Martez James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alex James, II v. Timothy Buchanan
as 19-3655
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEX M. JAMES, II
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY E. BUCHANAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Nasuti v. Whole Foods Market
as 19-1128
Defendant / Appellee:
WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., AKA WFM-WO, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JAMES NASUTI
Alford v. US
as 19-1678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES LUKE, RONALD WILSON, TROY ALFORD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
