Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Shaw v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 4:2018cv03033
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Shaw
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Citizens for Free Speech, LLC, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 18-15970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR FREE SPEECH, LLC and MICHAEL SHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, EAST COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS, FRANK J. IMHOFF and others
USA v. Randy Mainwaring
as 18-30109
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY ARLEN MAINWARING, AKA Randy Michael Shaw
Citizens for Free Speech, LLC et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2018cv00834
Defendant:
County of Alameda , East County Board of Zoning Adjustments , Frank J Imhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Free Speech, LLC and Michael Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Browne v. Hyne
as 17-1304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kendall Browne
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles J. Hynes, Individually and as District Attorney of Kings County, Eric T. Schneiderman, as Attorney General of the State of New York, New York State Supreme Court and others
Smith v. Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01211
Plaintiff:
Sandy Smith, Jr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, Winn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLDMAN et al v. SHAW et al
as 1:2016cv01183
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA GOLDMAN and GARY GOLDMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL SHAW, JR, JOHN DOES I TO C, JANE DOES I TO C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields v. Cardinal Health et al
as 3:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Cardinal Health and Michael Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
