Cases 51 - 60 of 526
Mace v. Prumell et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Mace
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prumell, Jennifer Jordan, Poulton Tamantha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MACE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22057
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BERRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MAC DONALD BERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C. HANSEN, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTES (MACE) v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01418
Petitioner:
ANNETTE ESTES (MACE)
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Kitchen v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Kitchen
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Larry Williamson, Lane Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2022cv50342
Plaintiff:
Renard D. Macklin
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Dan Oshea, New Towne Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Provo City et al
as 2:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Gaylene Davis and Mace, Jason Todd the Estate of
Defendant:
Provo City, Medina Dore, Jason Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
