Cases 51 - 60 of 265
Clervrain v. Grimes
as 3:2021cv00400
Defendant:
Alison Lundergan Grimes, Andre Matevousian, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2021cv01503
Defendant:
J. Fox, Chris Synsvoll, SIS Tech Kerri Lewis-Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castro-Gonzalez v. Brewer et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Walter Wood, Diane Rogers, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Castro-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Gomez
as 21-1114
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL PITTMAN, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ
Sanchez v. Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jeffery Keller, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldissi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matt Aldissi and Mahmoud Aldissi
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, Alan Cohen, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2020cv03658
Plaintiff:
Lennis James Hill
Defendant:
Gourodono, Stancil, Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatmon v. Carvajal et al
as 2:2020cv02182
Defendant:
Melissa Ross, Gene Beasley, Michael Carvajal and others
Plaintiff:
Kolany Vidal Chatmon, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
