Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Woods v. McHale et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv05689
Plaintiff: Anthony Woods
Defendant: Michael McHale and Michael Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Holme
as 14-5776
Movant: In re: MICHAEL HOLMES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Holmes v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02267
Plaintiff: Michael Holmes
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Petitioner: MICHAEL HOLMES
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and JOHN KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2013cv07526
Plaintiff: Michael Holmes
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
James Hampton v. Glen Dewlow, et al
as 13-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee: GLEN DEWLOW, Sheriff, RICHARD BROGAN, Commander and MICHAEL HOLMES, Superintendent
In re: Michael Holme
as 13-3018
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL HOLMES
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Holmes, et al v. CHEVY, et al
as 2:2013cv00804
Plaintiff: J Michael Holmes and Denise M Holmes
Defendant: CHEVY , Capital One, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Estorga, Jr. v. Smith et al
as 7:2013cv00028
Defendant: Judge Gene Ater, Dennis Carda, John Cliff and others
Plaintiff: Marcario Estorga, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Slay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv02333
Plaintiff: Michael Holmes
Defendant: Francis G. Slay , Bettye Battle-Turner , Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?