Cases 51 - 60 of 943
PHAM et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv04601
Plaintiff:
THANH N PHAM, THUY PHUONG PHAM and MICHAEL M. PHAM
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
US BANK NA v. COZZONE, et al
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
US BANK NA
Defendant:
JOAN C COZZONE and MICHAEL M COZZONE, JR
Interested Party:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, RELIANT LOAN SERVICING LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brian A. PerriIn re: Brian A. Perri
as 22-2994
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN A. PERRI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Moore v. County of San Juan et al
as 2:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Michael M Moore
Defendant:
County of San Juan, Randall Gaylord, Teresa Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
BEY v. BAYLSON
as 2:2022cv03917
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL HICKSON BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPORT-BLX, Inc. v. Salerno et al
as 1:2022cv08111
Plaintiff:
SPORT-BLX, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael M Salerno, Northeast Professional Planning Group, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Office of Staff Attorneys, Psychiatric Security Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Meed v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04333
Plaintiff:
Michael M Meed
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
