Cases 51 - 60 of 390
GMO TRUST et al v. BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
GMO TRUST, GMO ALPHA ONLY FUND, GMO BENCHMARK FREE FUND and others
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES INC. and BAUSCH + LOMB CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal: Securities Fraud
Mie Moulton v. BET Information System, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Mie Moulton
Defendant:
BET Information System, Inc. and Does 1 thru 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Abdual Desean Williams v. Joey Lin et al
as 5:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Abdual Desean Williams
Defendant:
Joey Lin, Bryan Moulton and Brett Stennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moulton, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Moulton, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chin v. Moulton et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
DESMOND CHIN
Defendant:
MARK MOULTON and CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joiner v. City of Moulton
as 5:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Joiner, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Moulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Moulton, Jr. v. Jamison
as 3:2021cv02082
Petitioner:
Richard M. Moulton, Jr.
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
