Cases 51 - 60 of 4,552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
USA v. Myelicia Rodgers
as 24-10638
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MYELICIA T. RODGERS
Rodgers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ricky Rodgers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodgers v. Btisza et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
Btisza, Kacey and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Yniguez et al
as 3:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Kyle Benjamin Rodgers
Defendant:
R Yniguez, J. Johnson and D. Freitas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brent Jacoby v. John Hamm, et al
as 24-10574
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN Q. HAMM, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and others
Rodgers v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00488
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rodgers
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
