Cases 51 - 60 of 595
Jones v. Office of the Warden
as 3:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Robert C. Jones
Respondent:
Office of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07012
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOUIS JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. De La Rosa et al
as 5:2022ct03121
Plaintiff:
Robert Wealasby Jones
Defendant:
G.L. De La Rosa, C. Monahan, C.E. Fidler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berkley Insurance Company v. Jones
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Berkley Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jones v. Goodwin et al
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, II
Defendant:
Taylor Goodwin, Richard Townsend, Aaron Waibel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Lane v. Cole et al
as 6:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Eddie Cole, Ofc. Robert L. Jones, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery Wooden v. The Town of Eatonville, et al
as 22-10649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY WOODEN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TOWN OF EATONVILLE, ROY SMITH, Individually, ROBERT L. JONES, Individually and others
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
