Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 762
Barbati v. Flowers
as 6:2023cv00537
Plaintiff: Nicholas Barbati
Defendant: Mark Flowers
Consolidated Defendant: Micah Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbati v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2023cv00538
Plaintiff: Nicholas Barbati
Defendant: Micah Scarborough and Mark Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Scarborough et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00146
Plaintiff: Thomas Reid
Defendant: Steven Scarborough and Town of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Wiley et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff: Christie Scarborough
Defendant: William "Bill" Wiley and Susan Shick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff: Joseph David Scarborough
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scarborough v. TDCJ, Director
as 3:2023cv00378
Petitioner: Joseph David Scarborough
Respondent: TDCJ, Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scarborough v. Daniel et al
as 5:2023cv00008
Plaintiff: Christie Scarborough
Defendant: Mary Daniel, Nicholas Hager and Frederick County of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E. Scarborough, IIIIn re: E. Scarborough, III
as 23-1284
Petitioner: In re: E. THOMAS SCARBOROUGH, III
Respondent: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Allen v. Scarborough
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff: Andrew Mark Allen
Defendant: J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Scarborough
as 23-7005
Petitioner: SCHUYLER L. SCARBOROUGH
Respondent: JANET DOWLING, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?