Cases 51 - 60 of 231
Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Integrated Drive Systems LLC
as 20-1124
Appellant:
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Appellee:
INTEGRATED DRIVE SYSTEMS LLC
Bickham v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 2:2019cv12958
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Plaintiff:
Craig Bickham
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Sharon Beazley, et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 19-30734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON KIM BEAZLEY, individually & on behalf of minor child, LMB, LILLIAN MARIE BEAZLEY, JAKE LYNFIELD BEAZLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hsieh v. Apache Deepwater, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Nustar Pipeline Company, LLC, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP, Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Hsieh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavilla v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv01588
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cavilla
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation and DOES 1 Through 100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01319
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. EnerPol, LLC
as 4:2019cv01196
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Defendant:
EnerPol, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
