Cases 51 - 60 of 1,229
Doe v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05166
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and Wireless Vision LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Aspen Networks, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Aspen Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Unimax Communications LLC v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
UNIMAX Communications, LLC and Unimax Communications LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ali v. AT and T et al
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT and T, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rouse v. T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv16028
Plaintiff:
Hank Rouse
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mann v. Mayorkas et al
as 6:2023cv00771
Defendant:
Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas, The National Security Council and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
