Cases 51 - 60 of 6,740
Franzese et al v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
Raffale Franzese and Maria M. Franzese
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Natal v. Target Corporation
as 0:2024cv60684
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Curet Natal
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Potts v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Shalisha Potts
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PAYNE v. TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
HARRIS PAYNE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION OF MINNESOTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
del Carmen Sigala Gonzalez v. Target Corporation
as 5:2024cv02399
Plaintiff:
Maria del Carmen Sigala Gonzalez
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jordan v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Janice Jordan
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Stores Incorporated (FN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bray v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Bray
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Red Bull North America, Inc., Matador Distributing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Province v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Richard Province
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez Maritza
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Faublas v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Fritz Faublas
Defendant:
Target Corporation (D/B/A Target Stores), Dayton Hudson Corp. and Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
