Cases 51 - 60 of 19,708
Barry et al v. Newaygo, County of, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Barry, Mark Booher, Tom Burkholder and others
Defendant:
Heemstra Enterprises, LLC, Newaygo, County of, Jason O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04172
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Amador, Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alabi v. Vilsack
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Aliu Alabi
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
WATSON v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA, BEAVER COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newson v. Newson et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Dennis H. Newson, Go 2 Inn Suites and Inspire Apartment, El Paso Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neil v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul O'Neil
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd Headley and others
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RIESER v. CLADEK et al
as 3:2024cv06226
Plaintiff:
ERIC RIESER
Defendant:
MATTHEW CLADEK, D KORPON and TOMS RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS A TO Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
