Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Unknown Thomas, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowry #159208 v. Knight et al
as 2:2013cv02053
Plaintiff:
Arron Eugene Mowry
Defendant:
Unknown Knight, Unknown Evans and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
High et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Kenneth High and Darlene High
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Unknown Evans , Unknown McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fairfield #435479 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Fairfield #435479, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Alexander, Unknown Pokely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dwayne Kelly
Defendant:
Unknown Bishop, Unknown Evans, Unknown Badger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Dixon Correctional Institute et al
as 3:2011cv00643
Defendant:
Unknown Cain, Dixon Correctional Institute, Unknown Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Vanteell Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dawson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Lang, E Vinluan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penn #587766 v. Evans et al
as 1:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tony Penn #587766
Defendant:
Unknown Evans, Unknown Florios, Unknown Kish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shook v. Bristow et al
as 2:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Steven L Shook
Defendant:
Unknown Bristow, Unknown Sharp, Unknown Swanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Tempe, City of, et al
as 2:2010cv01377
Plaintiff:
Trever Gaines
Defendant:
Tempe, City of , D W McKinney , Unknown McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
