Cases 61 - 70 of 5,352
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jennings v. Empress Dow Dolle et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Prince George Jennings
Defendant:
Empress Dow Dolle, Turn Key Realty and Mariah Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Rich, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Prince George's County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Johnte' Dorsey
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Dept., Detective Windsor, Detective Ann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Pinkney v. Prince George's County, MD
as 8:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Chinette Y. Pinkney
Defendant:
Prince George's County, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Van Prince
Defendant:
Ignatius, Pharmacy Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
