Cases 61 - 70 of 1,903
William Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, P.C., et al
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAVAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and COLLENE K. CORCORAN
Grace Wilson Marshall v. Benjamin Caudill, et al
as 23-5938
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRACE L. WILSON MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RYAN CAUDILL, VALERIE SCHROEDER KERSHAW, JENNIFER HALL CAUDILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DONNER v. RANKIN et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DONNER
Defendant:
MARK RANKIN and NEW BERN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rankin v. Harris Teeter, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02864
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rankin
Defendant:
Harris Teeter LLC, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MSTREO, LLC v. Swims et al
as 3:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
MSTREO, LLC
Defendant:
Talechia Swims, United States of America, Larry Swales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY v. RANKIN et al
as 2:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY
Defendant:
OWEN RANKIN and ARDILLIA C. RANKIN
Rankin v. Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kirk Jerome Rankin
Defendant:
Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
