Cases 61 - 70 of 798
BABSTOCK et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv11149
Plaintiff:
JOHN BABSTOCK, Michael Clinton, MARCELINO CORREA and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HATTON v. STORMS et al
as 1:2022cv01417
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Defendant:
STORMS and S. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatton et al v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv11564
Plaintiff:
David Hatton, Ryan Heidenreich and People Driven Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Presidio, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC and Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01286
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deloney v. Stewart et al
as 2:2022cv11455
Plaintiff:
Bedford Deloney
Defendant:
Stewart, Peters, King and others
HATTON v. MEHROTRA
as 1:2022cv01587
Not Classified By Court:
ANUJA MEHROTRA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HATTON
Defendant:
ANUJA MEHROTRA/ CSOSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Timothy Hatton v. Mark Sevier
as 22-1938
Applicant:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden
HATTON v. CSOSA SUPERVISION AGENCY et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HATTON
Defendant:
CSOSA SUPERVISION AGENCY, DEIRDRE MCDANIEL and ANUJA MEHROTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Villagrana v. Kernan et al
as 4:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio Villagrana
Defendant:
Scott Kernan and S. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
