Cases 61 - 70 of 103
EMG Technology, LLC v. AOL, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00501
Plaintiff:
EMG Technology, LLC
Defendant:
AOL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Augme Technologies, Inc. v. AOL Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05439
Plaintiff:
Augme Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
AOL Inc. , Time Warner, Inc. , Platform-A, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Time Warner, Inc. , Platform-A, Inc. , AOL Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Augme Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hall v. AOL, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02415
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hall
Defendant:
AOL, Inc. and The HuffingtonPost.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Suffolk Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Suffolk Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
AOL Inc. and Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Transcenic, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc91158
Plaintiff:
Transcenic, Inc.
Defendant:
Google, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, AOL Inc. and others
Movant:
Ellen C. Childress
Rosenfarb v. AOL, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03497
Plaintiff:
Marilyn B. Rosenfarb
Defendant:
AOL, Inc. , Tim Armstrong and Arthur T. Minson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Andrea Carter-Bowman Ltd v. AOL Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03826
Defendant:
AOL Inc, Does and TheHuffingtonPost.com Inc
Plaintiff:
Andrea Carter-Bowman Ltd
Rault Resources, Inc. v AOL Inc.
as 2:2012cv00923
Defendant:
AOL Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rault Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Tasini v. AOL, Inc.
as 12-1428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Molly Secours, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Tara Dublin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AOL, Inc., The HuffingtonPost.com, Inc., Arianna Huffington and others
MacroSolve, Inc. v. AOL Inc.
as 6:2012cv00091
Defendant:
AOL Inc.
Plaintiff:
MacroSolve, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
