Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Clark et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14190
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Ann Clark and Michael Steve Clark
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03821
Plaintiff:
Scherrie Ann Clark
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2015cv01077
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29739
Plaintiff:
Sharon Miller , Ann Clark , Bette Fudge and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03336
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Clark
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Pfizer International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01403
Plaintiff:
Sharon Miller , Ann Clark , Bette Fudge and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randall Rolle v. Nikki Clark, et al
as 14-13629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
NIKKI ANN CLARK, Judge, JOSEPH LEWIS, Judge, SCOTT DOUGLAS MAKAR, Judge and others
Clark v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv03104
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Clark
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pfizer International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
