Cases 61 - 70 of 370
Robledo-Valdez v. Aramark Correctional Services, et al
as 20-1367
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW, JOSHUA LANG, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG S. ROBLEDO-VALDEZ
Floyd v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curtis Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DEA GOAD, KATHY ALVEY and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN R. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS
Defendant:
TODD NEAL, DORA ALLERNA, TYLEAH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Mann v. Aramark Corr Srvs, et al
as 20-5732
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CONNIE HELTON and RANDY INGRAM
Defendant:
AMANDA DURRETT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MANN
Delacruz v. Alameda County et al
as 3:2020cv04016
Defendant:
Lt. Carrie Carone, Deputy A. Procopio, Alameda County and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Louis Delacruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angel Peterson v. Anthony Steward, et al
as 20-1421
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, RASHEED ANSARI, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL PETERSON
Barfell v. Hayes et al
as 2:2020cv00676
Defendant:
Sgt Durrant, John Matz, Deputy Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temujin KensuIn re: Temujin Kensu
as 20-105
Respondent:
PATRICIA CARUSO, DOES 1-200, (MDOC Food Service Managers), DAN HEYNS and others
Petitioner:
In re: TEMUJIN KENSU
Bilal Muhammad v. Richard Wiles, et al
as 20-50279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID STOUT, RICARDO SAMANIEGO, EL PASO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL MUHAMMAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
