Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Rothschild et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Rothschild , Christine F. Rothschild , Wendy Sue Jackson and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00720
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Corey Walker, R. Ebersole, A. Hartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henre et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Henre, Sr. and Wilma K. Henre
Defendant:
Jason Allen, William Bais, B. Bunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00398
Plaintiff:
David B Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Coring, III v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Coring, III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, S Wellhauser, Randall Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothschild et al v. Target
as UT/1:13-cv-00178
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Rothschild , Christine F. Rothschild , Wendy Sue Jackson and others
Defendant:
Target
Roberts et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33700
Plaintiff:
Mary B. Roberts and Kenneth Roberts
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothschild et al v. Target
as 1:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Rothschild , Christine F. Rothschild , Wendy Sue Jackson and others
Defendant:
Target
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Priutt et al
as 1:2013cv03604
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Warren Priutt, Kevin Brown and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26978
Plaintiff:
Reba Jo Roberts and Howard B. Roberts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
