Cases 61 - 70 of 12,860
Bryant Harris v. Brian Eller
as 24-5503
Petitioner:
BRYANT J. HARRIS
Respondent:
BRIAN ELLER, Warden
McCullough v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee McCullough
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Amanda Honeycutt, Molly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justin Tolston v. City of Atlanta, Georgia, et al
as 24-11001
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN T. TOLSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, RODNEY BRYANT, FNU WADSWORTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Johns v. United States of America et al
as 0:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Nicole Johns
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Indian Bureau of Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2024cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ana Ortiz, Anthony Ortiz and Antonio Bryant
Defendant:
DCFS, Ruth Mejias, Theresa Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
