Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
McKinney v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2018cv02013
Defendant:
Prime Care, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Warden Brian Clark
Plaintiff:
Monta McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RCM Fund 1 Owner, LLC et al v. All Unauthorized Occupants
as 1:2018cv03966
Plaintiff:
WRI Property Management, LLC and RCM Fund 1 Owner, LLC
Petitioner:
Brian Clark
Defendant:
All Unauthorized Occupants
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitfield v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2018cv01390
Defendant:
Warden Brian Clark, Dr. Young, Dauphin County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv03538
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK and DOROTHY CLARK
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potts et al v. Postal Trucking Company
as 1:2017cv02386
Plaintiff:
Brian Clarke, Alberto Florentino and Billy J. Potts
Defendant:
Clifton B Finkle and Postal Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark v. Caldwell County Detention Center
as 5:2017cv06044
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Brian Clark
Defendant:
Caldwell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whiting v. Lambert et al
as 2:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
Michael C Whiting
Defendant:
Adrian Lambert, Paul T Duron, Deana R Davis-McBroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Roberts, et al. v. City of Chula Vista
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts , Timothy Abrams , David Albright and others
Defendant:
Chula Vista, City of and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
