Cases 61 - 70 of 385
Wilson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv06846
Defendant:
C/O Herrerah, Cook County Jail and Thomas J. Dart
Plaintiff:
Qawmane C. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostoyic v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2019cv02355
Defendant:
Gregory C. Wilson and Howard Andrew Buchanan
Plaintiff:
Gary Ostoyic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America (IRS) v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv03484
Defendant:
6122 Cedar Creek, L.P., Norman Kuan, Lisa C. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
State of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, on behalf of the Heirs of Tract ID 8Q5 25 et al
as 4:2019cv00347
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, on behalf of the Heirs of Tract ID 8Q5 25, John Wilson, Nathaniel C Wilson, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
Wilson #079092 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2019cv04561
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Aaron C Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moler v. Baty et al
as 2:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Tecora Ballom, T Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03377
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00854
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wilson vs. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01000
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Samantha C. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
