Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Dinisio et al
as 8:2008cv02990
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Dinisio, State Of Maryland and Talbot County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Donald Kelchner
as 08-4095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD KELCHNER, SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMP HILL and DA PHILADELPHIA
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00648
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Vasquez
as 1:2008cv00258
Petitioner:
Charles E Smith
Respondent:
Philip Vasquez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker v. Smith et al
as 8:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker
Defendant:
Charles E. Smith, United States of America and Law Office of David M. Wasser
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Northoaks Health Systems et al
as 2:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Northoaks Health Systems, James Cathney, Cindy Coats and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. KELCHNER et al
as 2:2008cv01181
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
DONALD KELCHNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobson, et al v. Anderson, et al
as 08-7018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAT DOBSON and DONNIE DOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHEENA DELL ANDERSON, an individual, SHARON ARNOLD, an individual, ANDREA BAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
